my-KART Endurance

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #4446
    TheFazz
    Member

    agree to review the concept. however, only for the following race. may even scrap the enduro and call it the IC3.

    #4447
    Nohad
    Participant

    [quote=TheFazz]may even scrap the enduro and call it the IC3.[/quote]

    Hmmmm… if the response is that bad.

    On the other hand, why not.

    #4454
    luen
    Participant

    what if

    1. team can run 1 or 2 karts. A kart consists of 2 drivers. Example
    Gilaracing 1 and gilaracing 2, both belongs to same team gilaracing. Basically just like F1 a team of 2 cars.

    good thing is, only look for 2 drivers to form team. Team drivers can interchange any team1 and 2 as they wish, therefore no need to worry so much to get 4 drivers to start a team.

    championship point,

    Suggestion of point scoring format base on the number of team participation. Example. 4 teams running, 1 place will get 4 points and the last will get 1 point. This way, every team will opt for the bigger event (more teams partipation)to score whatever loses they need. Otherway saying is encouringing more teams to take part to score more points.

    Firstly, quorum of karts to be run on track must fix a minimum limit then follow by team. 8 karts we only need 4 teams of 2 drivers each, instead of base of guorum of team. Example, team gilaracing with 2 teams, team B and C with 1 team each (total of 8 karts) still doable.To be on the fairside, team gilaracing can only score 7 points max. That can easily cope up the score by a new comer team later that partipate in 12 teams event (if new comer team with podium finish)

    just my 2 sen

    ———————————-
    neat, balance and practical

    #4455
    luen
    Participant

    aside to that, I can sense more strategy and tricks, team order will be applied to the race….wow like real only

    ———————————-
    neat, balance and practical

    #4456
    TheFazz
    Member

    [quote=luen]1. team can run 1 or 2 karts. A kart consists of 2 drivers.[/quote]

    good idea. shorten the event to one hour perhaps? i like this – and we can still maintain the standard enduro teams…

    [quote=luen]championship point,

    Suggestion of point scoring format base on the number of team participation. Example. 4 teams running, 1 place will get 4 points and the last will get 1 point. This way, every team will opt for the bigger event (more teams partipation)to score whatever loses they need. Otherway saying is encouringing more teams to take part to score more points.[/quote]

    i am a little unclear regarding the points scoring system. i would suggest that the best finishing kart per each team to be eligible for points scoring.

    on concerns if one of the karts plays “defensive” then they would be taking the risk by sacrificing one team (slow & defensive)… you would never know about the reliability of the other kart. so i think both karts should go for it.

    let’s keep the discussion going as i think we can still salvage the event this saturday.

    #4458
    luen
    Participant

    the reason of both karts score points is to encourage principal team to participate with more teams/karts. Errrmmmm, say;

    Point scoring base on the number of principal team. In the example below is 4 principal teams.

    ====================================================================
    Principal team : TEAM GILAracing
    team 1: Gila 1 (2 drivers)
    team 2: Gila 2 (2 drivers)

    principal team : B racing team
    Team 1 : B1 (2 drivers)

    principal team : C racing team
    team 1 : C1 (2 drivers)

    principal team : D racing team
    team 1 : D1 (2 drivers

    Result :
    1st B1
    2nd C1
    3rd Gila 1
    4th Gila 2
    5th D1
    championship points:
    Team Gilaracing 3 points (1 for 4th and 2 for 3rd)
    Team B1 4 points (4 for 1st place)
    team C1 3 points (3 for 2nd place)
    team D1 0 points

    =================================================================

    by looking at the example above, notice the close points. This shall encouring principal Team B, C and D to get the 2nd team with extra drivers to pariticipate next round.

    ———————————-
    neat, balance and practical

    #4459
    luen
    Participant

    but the only problem is, if there are 10 principal teams that running of 2 teams each, we need 20 karts on the track X(

    then again need to set First-come-first server(FCFS) basis. My suggestion is we need not worry so much of the overwhelm team principal participation, that we can split to another new chapter enduro series discussion.

    ———————————-
    neat, balance and practical

    #4462
    TheFazz
    Member

    i see what you are saying bro. but i think we need to limit the number of karts a team can enter. otherwise we would end up with teams merging. lol. but also the other thing with the points score for every kart is that the team with the most karts would be in the best position hence a runaway championship leader.

    i would still rather have the best result count…. so each team will only have one scoring kart… but the ones with more than one kart will have a better mathematical chance.

    #4463
    luen
    Participant

    yes we limit to 2 teams max per principal team.

    But then it may not have the full moment of joy if a principal team finishes 1 2 like the ferrari always does when they can only enjoy 1 kart scoring.

    ———————————-
    neat, balance and practical

    #4464
    TheFazz
    Member

    [quote=luen]But then it may not have the full moment of joy if a principal team finishes 1 2 like the ferrari always does when they can only enjoy 1 kart scoring.[/quote]

    sure. we can do this but limited to max two karts per team. i guess no problems if both karts scores.

    #4469
    naza
    Participant

    [quote=luen]yes we limit to 2 teams max per principal team.

    But then it may not have the full moment of joy if a principal team finishes 1 2 like the ferrari always does when they can only enjoy 1 kart scoring.

    ———————————-
    neat, balance and practical[/quote]
    …Fantastic guys! Two teams per principal will add more spice definitely. Freedom to interchange drivers will be even hotter! Cost can still be the same if we run it for 1 hour….I hope so?

    Total minimum weight of the 2 driver team will ber maintained as before?

    Note: …But it will be a relatively quiet race….people wise I mean.

    #4473
    bosozoku
    Participant

    sounds like F1… two cars / Team, interesting…
    New / small team (for those who dont hav enuf driver) can still get points from the championship… I hope this will be a good step to get more teams to join..

    #4477
    luen
    Participant

    It should run 30 minutes of drivers of 2. Perhaps if we can run 40 minutes if the top ups are not so great within reasonable range of majority.

    Weight retain the same as per driver 65kg above or 70kg above? that makes 130kg or 140kg per team. Principal has the freedom to interchange driver for the next race event not during the event.

    Team Principal has unlimitted call for pit-in at anytime, there will no pitting windows required and refueling is not mandated. Team principal has the right to apply team order with strategy.

    ———————————-
    neat, balance and practical

    #4478
    TheFazz
    Member

    [quote=luen]It should run 30 minutes of drivers of 2. Perhaps if we can run 40 minutes if the top ups are not so great within reasonable range of majority.

    Weight retain the same as per driver 65kg above or 70kg above? that makes 130kg or 140kg per team. Principal has the freedom to interchange driver for the next race event not during the event.

    Team Principal has unlimitted call for pit-in at anytime, there will no pitting windows required and refueling is not mandated. Team principal has the right to apply team order with strategy. [/quote]

    thanks luen for driving this. i think this is an acceptable solution. as for the weights… minimum male = 67.5kg and minimum female = 57.5kg.

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.