naza

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 716 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Ironman challenge Enduro #6071
    naza
    Participant

    [quote=edwynlow][quote=Nohad][quote=edwynlow]yumcha..
    ~ say something in vietnamese~ 😛 [/quote]

    Uong cha? Duoc, khi nao? 😉

    Drink tea? Can, when?
    [/quote]

    So Naza, khi nao?[/quote]

    Thursday night uong cha laaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrr……!

    in reply to: Ironman challenge Enduro #6067
    naza
    Participant

    [quote=edwynlow]yumcha.. when? cepat la.. naza remember to text me![/quote]

    ….can ..can, ..that Vietnam dude quiet laaar!

    in reply to: Ironman challenge Enduro #6063
    naza
    Participant

    [quote=luen][quote=Nohad][quote=RawFlesh]I’m game but depends on date…..[/quote]

    Me too! Looks like I will be able to join in only on the weekend immediately after CNY next year earliest ;( unless it could be held on this weekend 😉 [/quote]

    Patrick you back home now?
    ———————————-
    neat, balance and practical[/quote]

    …Oiiii!,…..yum cha loh!

    in reply to: mega endurance race 2007 (commitee discussion) #6059
    naza
    Participant

    Luen, Folks,

    heee heee heee!, take a look at this:

    14. VM Motorsport
    1. Nizam Rahman (nizer)| 51Kg (with racing gear)
    2. Nazri Ng | 58Kg (with racing gear)
    3. Jamizan Jamaludin | 60Kg (with racing gear)
    4. Suhazlan | 58Kg (with racing gear)
    Total weight : 227kg

    You think they care if they start a mile behind?….hee hee hee!

    in reply to: mega endurance race 2007 (commitee discussion) #6055
    naza
    Participant

    [quote=luen]for the team i mean haha short of “m”[/quote]

    Ok luen,yes that 20 mins originally was for testing and qualifying includes whatever preparations and minor adjustments needed with the mechanics. Any kart change (if approved) must be done within this period.

    …or you mean reduce the 20 mins testing session to just 5 mins?

    in reply to: mega endurance race 2007 (commitee discussion) #6051
    naza
    Participant

    [quote=luen]Bro Naza, i think is better to have 5 minutes free practice for preparing the kart for the tea, [/quote]

    …..hmmmm? 😕

    in reply to: Jazeman watch #6048
    naza
    Participant

    [quote=RawFlesh]……. but in spec racing, everyone’s spose to be the same, if not the same, whether give advantage or not, it’s an illegal car.[/quote]

    ..Yeah I guess, thats the bottom line ….rule are rules, too bad Jazeman!, hopefully this incident will be forgotten and gone.

    in reply to: Jazeman watch #6039
    naza
    Participant

    [quote=mikko]It was a “gear selector spring” apparently that wasn’t spec according to star.[/quote]

    ..so any idea how this “not to spec stupid spring” will give them an unfair advantage?…serious enough to exclude them.

    Its amazing how the scrutineers can detect this “not to spec spring”.

    in reply to: Jazeman watch #6033
    naza
    Participant

    Its just mind boggling! The report said team Meritus committed the same infringement during the Indon leg and now in rd 22….but no details on actually what is was about……..what a shame when Meritus have a crop of very good drivers!

    in reply to: Ironman challenge Enduro #6023
    naza
    Participant

    [quote=edwynlow]…….[i]luen[/i]atic endurance~[/quote]

    Hee hee hee…maaf ye bro!

    in reply to: Ironman challenge Enduro #6019
    naza
    Participant

    [quote=bombe994][color=#cc0000]cam best je … we are talking 80cc or 100cc here?[/color][/quote]
    80cc la bro, AP tak kasi bawak 100cc dua jam….hehehe!

    in reply to: mega endurance race 2007 (commitee discussion) #6008
    naza
    Participant

    [quote=bosozoku]yup… less work for the committee 😉
    more time to strategist & concentrate (once all the ballast are installed) 🙂 [/quote]

    Bro, can we share data and strategy aka A1GP teams France and Netherlands was it?

    in reply to: Ironman challenge Enduro #6007
    naza
    Participant

    Are you crazy?…better see a doctor quick!…but:

    1. Team Naza Gils

    2. Team TeleVAS

    3. Team Edwyn

    4. Team Luen Loonies (for daring to suggest such lunacy!)

    5. Team Tangerine (aunt Azlin’s!)

    6. Team Jacko

    in reply to: mega endurance race 2007 (commitee discussion) #6002
    naza
    Participant

    [quote=luen]total team weight will weigh before the race, ballast will mount on before qualifying.

    1. weight add-on of 6kg if fall below par according as mentioned by Naza(before race)
    2. penalty time will impose on final race result. (after race). Example, If 2 teams finish at same number of laps time penalty will impose deciding of results.

    [/quote]
    Luen,
    For qualifying, the average of 4 drivers best lap is taken and the quickest gets pole position right? I was thinking that since we are going to use weight + time penalties, we can simply arrange the starting grid with the lightest at the back and the heaviest at the front loh!

    If that’s the case, the 20 minutes qualifying can be use instead for testing and warming up for all drivers.

    in reply to: mega endurance race 2007 (commitee discussion) #5996
    naza
    Participant

    [quote=luen]is all about fair play.

    The constant number define the average weight. Perhaps lower to 68?

    I see no competition for a team that has total of has 50kg heavier than other

    example team 1 55kgx4= 220kg
    team 2 68kgx4= 272kg

    A more direct format proposed, discarding constant number; total weight divide by 4;

    below par 272kg(if taking 68kg constant) to 263kg will be added 6kg max for shortage to par.

    Team Further lower , 262 to 253kg(of every 10kg lower), will be added 6kg max + 5 sec penalty
    any below than that 6kg added + 5 secs of every 10kg lower

    sumarise:

    above 272kg.
    271~262 + 6kg
    261~252 + 6kg + 5 sec
    251~242 + 6kg + 10 sec
    241~232 + 6kg + 15 sec
    231~222 + 6kg + 20 sec
    221~212 + 6kg + 25 sec

    25 seconds is not much perhaps is just one corner away from turn 3 to turn 4. It is not taken much
    advantage for the heavier team. If comparing team with 212 and 272 of total weight.

    please feedback [/quote]

    Luen,
    The 10kg interval is too big I think. I propose we break them up into 5kg intervals as follows:

    above 272kg ~ No penalty
    271~267 + 6kg + 0 sec
    266~262 + 6kg + 5 sec
    261~257 + 6kg + 10 sec
    256~252 + 6kg + 15 sec
    251~247 + 6kg + 20 sec
    246~242 + 6kg + 25 sec
    241~237 + 6kg + 30 sec
    236~232 + 6kg + 35 sec
    231~227 + 6kg + 40 sec
    226~222 + 6kg + 45 sec
    221~217 + 6kg + 50 sec
    216~212 + 6kg + 55 sec

    The fairest way is to add ballast but CK dont have enough of these weights. Furthermore it would affect the bottom end drastically if too much weight is added. So the above is a compromised solution. The chances for the lightweight teams to win in the end will still be high even with the 6kg + time penalty added to it. The 212 – 216 kg category will likely be ladies or really skinny guys…..arrgh (had too much lomang- regret!)

    Perhaps we can announce an overall winner plus a 68+ kg winner and a 45+ kg winner, similar to the my-kart normal sprint races?

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 716 total)